![]() |
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
In the early phase of this forum, there was good discussion on small-scale production, and the scope for improving water control and household food security. With the potential of rainwater and catchment water harvesting, soil moisture, groundwater, and productive wetland systems, (notwithstanding soil fertility problems), the issues of water availability and rights of access to water are a lesser significant constraint than posed in the original 'think-piece'. I suggest that a second significant strand from a natural resource perspective has to be the rehabilitation and modernization of extisting irrigation schemes. The design life of an irrigation scheme is typically 30-50 years, and most large irrigation schemes are now well-past their sell-by date. As much as 50% of the existing irrigated area in Africa requires rehabilitation and modernization. Existing schemes are, anyway, generally the prime sites. These are again an important focus because a) rights to use water in these schemes are already in place, b) there are already integral in water management plans, c) much of the large-scale storage (dam) and conveyance infrastructure has already been invested in. So, again (like small-scale production) the water availability and rights constraints are less significant here than for new irrigation works. Rehabilitation and modernization brings new opportunities for realignment - and let us remember that the currently irrigated area of Africa is contributing less than 4% of the calorific intake needs of the current African population. Large amounts of water, but wrong outcomes! Rehabilitation of irrigation is required fundamentally in certain countries to meet national minimum nutritional and calorific intakes. Irrigation rehab/modernization lies in the moddle of the intervention-outcome logic. Small-scale agriculture is going to contribute most (compared with other outcomes) to household poverty (nutrition, education, health, $ income etc). At the other end of the spectrum, NEW irrigation is going to have to be justified mostly by its contribution to economic growth (the new investment needs of new dam storage, O&M, competing access to water etc) but contributing little to poverty reduction amongst large numbers of people - but hopefully economic growth that still brings benefit within the African countries. The middle area of rehab/modernization of irrigation will almost certainly have to contribute to both spectrums of the outcome range. Andy Bullock
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.