New Directions for Agriculture in Reducing Poverty

Global Trade Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index]

RE: Unequal competition



Developing Community Empowerment on a Sustainable Basis



Reference: Vinay Chand?s contribution on ?Capacity for local empowerment,
dated May 22, 2004





For the three decades in Government working at various level for rural
development and thereafter as NGO leader, I have been working on developing
right approaches for negotiating with local community groups how a programme
should be initiated and developed that would become genuinely community?s
programme.



In my present organization Development Support Centre where I am a honorary
Chairman, we seem to have developed approach and methodology  that embodies
a process which helps the local community, step by step to consider their
problems,   analyze the reasons, examine options. At that point,  the
developing agency help the local groups to consider  more options
particularly by visiting success stories in the same field and then go back,
discuss within the community which options are more appropriate in their own
conditions. At that point the development agency again helps the local
groups to develop a programme which would combine local priorities and
knowledge and external experience and expertise. The agency would then
provide software support of community organizing, training and assist in
planning that could attract external funding.



This process has produced a remarkable results particularly in transferring
government canals to be managed by Farmers? Organizations ? called the
programme of Participatory Irrigation Management. Attached is a sheet
?Farmers as Managers? that summarizes the achievements of Water Users?
Associations which were promoted by Development Support Centre. The process
described about was followed and the supporting  association of Development
Support Centre with the WUAs has tapered down almost to the point that there
is no need for giving assistance  in decision making for the WUAs
established before three years. On the other hand DSC is using the leaders
of established WUAs to participate in conferences and programme where they
act as resource persons for sharing their experiences which now inspires
others to get organized as WUAs and take responsibility for management of
canals so far managed by government. I hope this experience will be of some
value in the issue raised by Vinay Chand in his email dated May 22 2004 on
the subject of ?capacity for local empowerment?.





Anil C Shah

Chairman



To:

Mr Vijay Chand

<address removed>

  -----Original Message-----
  From: <address removed>
[mailto:<address removed> Behalf Of Vinay Chand
  Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 8:28 PM
  To: global-trade
  Subject: Unequal competition


  Ruchi Tripathi's statements of Action Aid policy represents a very
commendable agenda in calling for regulatory steps on a global level to try
to even the playing field for developing countries. We are unfortunately no
where near even serious debate or possibility of achieving it.

  In the absence of imminent action to achieve regulatory protection, we
must consider what commodity exporters can be helped to achieve for
themselves and how those who are already convinced of the need for positive
discrimination among consumers in importing countries can do by exercising
their market rights.

  For me the crux of the problem lies in attitudes in commodity producing
countries which prevent them from being able to compete in the global
economy. The attitudes I refer to are typical of commodity producers in that
they offer for sale, they do not market or think in terms of marketing. If
all you do is produce and offer for sale, it is not surprising that buyers
will dictate prices that continually reduce you to survival levels. This is
the market ethos. The buyers will keep telling producers that their produce
is competing with others that are more attractive and that in any case is
competing with other suppliers of a better quality of the same produce. They
will finish by telling you that your quality standards are in any case poor.

  These attitudes need to change and there is no substitute for that. From
selling they need to change to marketing. That requires treating commodities
as products because increasingly all commodities are competing with others.
Even more it requires trying to transform commodities into products through
processing. The best assistance that can be given is not price information!
It is market information and intelligence but most of all marketing
technology. Changing attitudes!

  Although there may not be enough desire to introduce regulatory measures,
very many consumers are well inclined and the success of fair trade labels
are testament to that. Provided that fair trade boils down to paying farmers
more, it can be promoted for that reason to consumers in developed
countries. Better still is to combine fair trade with environmentally
friendly greener practices that will lead to better food products.

  DFID should concentrate on helping change attitudes through transfer of
marketing technology and assist in financing promotion of fair trade type
promotions.

  Best wishes,

  Vinay Chand,
  230, Finchley Road,
  London NW3 6DJ, UK
  Tel: 44-20-7794 5977
  Fax: 44-20-7431 5715
  <address removed>


Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.