![]() |
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
The facilitating documents for this whole consultation appear to me to be like opening a book at Chapter 2; namely how agriculturally-equipped societies can best contribute to economic growth and emerge from poverty through more advanced livelihood strategies. I feel the introductory remarks to the debate are thin indeed on the priority to eradicate hunger and the meeting of the World Food Summit objective, in the context that a majority of the African rural poor rely upon self-provisioning (for at least some) proportion of calorific and nutritional intake. Certain issues of rights of access to natural resources are significantly different in the context of self-provisioning compared with (even small) agricultural enterprises. Before commenting further on this particular issue (for example under the topic of risks and vulnerability), I would welcome the advice of the moderators as to why this critical aspect of agriculture appears to be given a very low profile. Perhaps it is not as critical as my experience has led me to believe it to be! Andy Bullock ============================================================= To send a reply to this message that goes to all list members, make sure that you send your reply to <address removed> To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to "<address removed>", with the message body: unsubscribe growth-and-poverty <your-email-address>
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.