New Directions for Agriculture in Reducing Poverty

Growth and Poverty Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index]

Effective cross sectoral interventions including agriculture - suggested pathways



 

Brussel 23-Apr-04

  <address removed> 

<address removed>

 

Alex Duncan



Dear Alex,



Please find below some reflections suggesting pathways for more effective 

cross sectoral interventions including agriculture in addressing chronic 
poverty.



Best regards,

Per 



P.S. Please as of April 26 send any mail to both email addresses appearing 
above.





  

FOR DFID DISCUSSION ON POVERTY AND GROWTH

Per A. Eklund



DFID early on articulated its position that addressing chronic poverty, food 
insecurity and vulnerability requires a multisectoral response.  Confronted 
with evidence of aid ineffectiveness, reflecting little attention in service 
delivery to vulnerability, location specific constraints and exclusion of 
resource poor households, DFID conceptualized its livelihoods system concept. 
Widely accepted is now the notion that poverty has many dimensions beyond 
income.  Yet across donors, capability in programme design for effectively 
addressing chronic poverty, demonstrating measurable impact, has not progressed 
in line with expectations. Agricultural line agencies and extension services 
are rarely geared to support community driven development, where cross sectoral 
interventions are combined to reinforce reductions in  prevalence of child 
malnutrition, where facilitators empower resource and knowledge poor households 
to express preferences for mix of interventions, for technology and supporting 
infrastructure and where they  begin to influence and control budgetary 
allocations. There is much room for experimentation in these dimensions, how to 
raise capabilities, how to involve local NGOs, in short for learning by doing.

 

DFID is positioned to extend further the knowledge frontier in designing and 
testing more effective poverty alleviation programmes. Market based 
interventions on their own - in the absence of empowerment mechanisms - do not 
suffice in removing underlying causes to endemic poverty.   DFID has concluded 
that 'support to agriculture, as part of a multisectoral response, will play a 
major part in meeting this challenge .' DFID's  comparative advantage may well 
rest in continued conceptualization of cross sectoral approaches for empowering 
deprived populations,  empirical testing of selected interventions, validating 
context and modalities. Evidence based policy recommendations are essential 
prior to scaling up, and replication. 

 

Clearly stated objectives for measurable progress drive organizations and 
development.  A relevant mix of indicators is needed for targeting and tracking 
poverty reduction. Income poverty is not necessarily well correlated with 
indicators for nutritional status. Mere use of income or monetary measurements 
of poverty within official development assistance easily leads to excessive 
focus in programme design on the role that market forces can play in poverty 
reduction. Non monetary poverty is associated with deprivation in terms of 
access to education, health, human and civil rights, gender equality and not 
least to health and nutrition knowledge; indicators are called for that reflect 
and relate to variations in these dimensions.

 

Anthropometric indicators particularly stunting (height-for-age) have been 
confirmed as relevant composite indicators for targeting cross sectoral 
interventions to population groups at risk, and with high prevalence of non 
monetary poverty: they are well suited for monitoring performance of cross 
sectoral interventions, and for evaluating impact. For children under 5, 
nutrition and health dominate genetic factors in explaining variations in 
stunting. Stunting reflects longer term deprivation, limited capabilities, 
exclusion of public goods.  Underweight (weight-for-age) in contrast relates 
largely to the seasonal variations in food supply. The relevance of 
anthropometric indicators of nutritional status for tracking poverty, 
particularly stunting, is reconfirmed in recent literature (Gillespie and 
Haddad, IFPRI 2003). Moreover, data on stunting and underweight for children 
under 5 are collected in the field at little cost relative to measurements of 
production, consumption and income.  

 

Stunting is particularly sensitive to gender inequality, to the mother's 
status, her nutrition, resource endowments, labour load, education and 
knowledge (IFPRI). Stunting is related to mother's BMI that reflects mother's 
exposure to stress... Child malnutrition improves, the more the mother has food 
or cash to procure food, the more formal schooling she has acquired, the more 
she is empowered, the more she has access to safe drinking water, and the more 
there is reasonable access to an effective health outreach (IFPRI 1999).  

 

Stunting is a powerful indicator with which to gauge capabilities or their 
absence within and across livelihood systems. Stunting implies probability of 
permanently impaired livelihood systems even for the next generation. Stunting 
is a powerful predictor of cognitive and motoric impairment with negative 
impact on schooling, and with substantial productivity loss in adulthood (see 
inter alia Alderman, Hoddinott and Kinsey study for Zimbabwe, under 
www.chronicpoverty.org). 

 

Tracking variations in stunting and in food security, health access and 
sanitation for resource poor households over time and across sites is useful. 
Differential benefits to households from accessing cross sectoral services 
emerge. But few donors have as yet begun to use stunting, with a minimal set of 
other indicators, for gauging complementarity, and resource use efficiency, of 
cross sectoral interventions. 

 

Large numbers of households are deprived of essential nutrition knowledge, this 
is yet another dimension of non monetary poverty. Studies in several countries 
suggest that large proportions of mothers are not aware that their children are 
stunted and what this implies. Resource allocations within and across their 
livelihood systems then remain non optimal, based on an inferior choice. On the 
other hand, when mothers learn to diagnose the growth status of their children 
and learn about underlying causes and solutions, this is a powerful instrument 
driving reductions in chronic malnutrition. Studies confirm that when mothers 
through growth promotion programmes learn if her child is stunted or not, 
understand causes and wider solutions, they become empowered, motivated to 
change behaviour within their given resource constraints.    Overall, the UN 
system and many other aid organisations have remained ineffective in 
transmitting knowledge for rural populations to diagnose growth faltering, 
learn causes and find sustainable local solutions. Few decision makers seem to 
realise the extent of this information failure and the high opportunity costs 
of omissions. 

 

Recent studies (China, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Morocco and Nepal) have pointed to 
the value of processes that empower parents with relevant knowledge about the 
nutritional status of their own children.  The acquisition of 'out-of-school' 
maternal knowledge by women in fertile age has an immediate and powerful effect 
in reducing deprivation relative to the delayed effect of primary schooling for 
female household members, and to per capita income growth. Such knowledge 
acquisition is found associated with accelerated reductions in stunting 
prevalence over and above the effect of growth in private income (e.g. see 
Alderman and Christiaensen's study in Ethiopia, World Bank). This knowledge 
diffusion is a particularly cost-effective instrument with which to empower and 
activate parents.

 

Community based organisations, especially women groups, represent a valid 
platform for ensuring that women, and men, access knowledge in diagnosing child 
malnutrition, and actively apply such knowledge in expressing their priorities 
across cross sectoral interventions. Parents seek to address causes to 
malnutrition as individuals but also at community level. Once parents find out 
that their child is stunted, this acts as an incentive for advocacy and 
resource mobilisation also for public goods. Cooperative local public good 
solutions may emerge. Women, probably more than men, drive the provision of 
safer drinking water, improved access roads during the rainy season, improved 
credit and savings associations for income generation, etc. 

 

A study from Bangladesh demonstrates that child malnutrition is significantly 
lower for members of women groups where credit is used for income generation 
through back yard poultry production (Pitt and Khandker, World Bank). The 
results are consistent with the view that women's participation in micro-credit 
programs helps to increase women's empowerment.  A recent study in two 
districts in Nepal suggests that children of members of autonomous community 
based self-help women organisations have better nutritional status, when these 
organisations have higher capabilities.  (Eklund, Imai, Felloni, see updated 
papers www. chronicpoverty.org). Yet, the latter study confirms that access to 
outside technical or scientific knowledge is important in addressing stunting. 
For other groups that received training from UNICEF in diagnosing malnourished 
children and finding solutions, such activity was found associated with reduced 
stunting prevalence. 

 

In many countries, especially in South Asia, stunting remains high, at 40% to 
50% prevalence, declining by less than one percentage point p.a. Nepal is but 
one such a case. In Sub-Saharan Africa, recent data from UNICEF for year 2000 
suggest that stunting prevalence was constant or decreasing for 16 of the 22 
countries for which data were made available.  Unless governments, better 
assisted by donors, begin to make concerted efforts to directly target stunting 
with a conceptual framework for decentralised service delivery, with particular 
support for women groups, prevalence will remain unacceptably high during this 
century. Thailand has demonstrated that successful efforts can be generated.

 

It remains that with the suggested conceptual framework, tracking stunting 
prevalence for deprived population groups generates insights for the design and 
evaluation of agricultural interventions with supporting infrastructure, not 
least in generating preconditions for reducing widespread protein-energy 
malnutrition.  

 


Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.