|
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
Farmer Organisations The most successful which I have encountered were the Savings Clubs in Zimbabwe. Set up in the 1960's somewhat modelled along the lines of the war time National Savings movement in the UK, members (voluntary) were obliged to save a minimum amount every week in the form of a stamp. By the time the rains were approaching there would be enough money to buy some hybrid maize seed, some fertiliser, some insecticide and some grain storage chemical for a minimum area of land. The key was that each club was independent. It was affiliated to a central organisation which it bought stamps and stationery from, cash. The central organisation provided some organisational and some agricultural advice as well as assistance with bulk buying if individual clubs opted in to that. All activities were undertaken by at least two officers, ie going to the Post office to bank money. Bus fares provided but accounted for out of the funds. This worked well and survived the Independence struggle and beyond and could not be taken over by any other organisation because of its diffuse nature. Thus farmers, voluntarily, were able to accumulate the means of procuring inputs from their very modest incomes. What this shows me is that input supply cooperatives have worked. Other more advanced forms have rarely, if ever been sustainable? If you are looking for a transient phenomenon, well enough, but something which is sustainable and durable over time.... Thanks James Biscoe 1/5/04 1700hrs
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.