New Directions for Agriculture in Reducing Poverty

Growth and Poverty Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index]

Comments from Booker Tate on the importance of agribusiness and possible intervention by DFID



Background on Booker Tate 
Booker Tate, a private limited company, provides operational and
project management services to agro-industrial businesses throughout the
world.  Best known for its continuing role in the management of sugar
producing companies, many of which have significant smallholder
components, it has also provided management services to companies in the
tea, coffee, oil palm, livestock, poultry and forestry sectors across a
wide range of natural resource environments.  

The DFID Policy paper entitled 'Agriculture and poverty reduction:
unlocking the potential' and related issues
Booker Tate welcomes DFID's renewed commitment to agriculture, as
stated in the Policy Paper, and shares its view that agriculture can
play a fundamental role in the alleviation of poverty through employment
creation, income generation and the provision of livelihoods.  We
endorse the view that support to agriculture in the developing world
should move towards achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. 

 
The importance of agribusiness We note that the focus of the Policy
Paper is on small farmer primary production rather than on the
commercial agricultural sector.  While assistance to small scale
production will undoubtedly make an important contribution to economic
development we would like to suggest that attention should also be given
to the commercial sector.  The production and sale of agricultural
produce or the opportunity for wage earning in agricultural businesses
provide an avenue for rural people to transfer from the subsistence to
the cash earning economy and thus escape from persistent poverty. 
Moreover agribusiness continues to play a crucial role in generating
income and employment throughout the development process.  Agricultural
businesses with processing units provide an assured market for the raw
materials of primary producers, commonly under offtake agreements, and
add value 'in country'.  The model of a processing company, possibly
with its own nucleus estate, contracting with smallholders/outgrowers
and providing services to them has had considerable success throughout
the developing world. 

The concentration of industry, agriculture, infrastructure,
communications and community services in one location rapidly becomes a
growth pole.  The inter-sectoral linkages between a for example, a large
scale cane sugar project with its requirements for fertilisers, fuel,
lubricants, process chemicals, spare parts, replacement equipment and
vehicles and other parts of the economy are strong. The large farming,
factory and service populations need feeding and this market opportunity
invariably stimulates agricultural production in surrounding areas.  The
wide range of ancillary services required by a cane sugar project
stimulates the development of small local businesses.  Meanwhile a
substantial transfer of skills and knowledge from the project into the
local economy is occurring as factory employees and cane farmers are
trained and professionally developed.  The result is that within a few
years a cane sugar project can have a profound, positive impact on the
incomes and welfare of poor rural people for miles around and on the
wider regional economy in general. We have seen this happen many times.

In summary, our experience has shown that commercial agricultural
projects act as development platforms.  They are centres of economic
activity in sometimes remote areas or difficult environments and
commonly have significant economic multiplier effects in the surrounding
region.  Large scale businesses are also often obliged to provide (at
considerable cost) housing, social infrastructure and a range of
community services (eg health care and education) in order to attract
the calibre of staff required to live and work in such areas.  They
therefore facilitate social cohesion in addition to providing
opportunities for economic advancement.  

However commercial agriculture in third world economies is commonly
characterised by relatively modest financial rewards and an exposure to
above average level of risks and this we believe has resulted in an
investment gap in that sector.

The investment gap 
 Even in stable times private capital is not always attracted to
emerging markets, especially at the poorer end of the GDP scale.  As
highlighted at a recent NEPAD conference: '(private) capital seeks
opportunity, never need'.  

Investment in the higher return sectors in the developing world (such
as power and telecommunications) is evident and in parallel public
sector aid provision, commonly with a specific poverty alleviation
focus, has achieved success.  In addition to the broad based development
finance institutions, which invest across a range of sectors, there are
several emerging market funds specifically covering sectors such as
infrastructure, empowerment and environment.  However investors and
lending agencies are commonly wary of the risk/reward profile inherent
in agriculture in emerging economies.  

We note that in recent years there has been a decline in investment in
commercial agriculture, notably in Africa.  For example CDC Capital
Partners recently decided to divest from agriculture as part of its
change in investment strategy.  As a result we believe that there may be
investment opportunities in agriculture which are not being realised
owing to the dearth of appropriately priced funding.

To our knowledge there is no fund which understands and is committed to
the challenges of agribusiness investment in the developing world and
certainly not one with a UK base.  There is thus a perceived need for a
vehicle to harness financial resources and channel them into private
sector, sustainable agricultural projects which meet criteria for
(modest) investment returns and developmental, social, environmental,
ethical, health and safety and corporate governance standards in
emerging markets, particularly Africa.  Such a fund would complement
public sector/donor aid provision to the subsistence sector.  

A suggested role for DFID  

Criteria for participation   Given what we perceive to be a shortage of
relatively 'soft' investment funds for commercial agriculture projects
with significant economic benefits we would like to propose that DFID
might consider direct or indirect financial support for selected
projects/businesses which:

a) are technically feasible and generate a satisfactory commercial
return, bearing in mind the typical relatively high risk/low reward
profile of the agribusiness sector in emerging economies;
b) offer good prospects for pro-poor economic development impact (eg
local  employment creation, outgrower development, promotion of local
business participation in input supply and output marketing, etc )
achievable in a sustainable manner;
c) engender economic empowerment;
d) meet ethical, environmental, social and health and safety criteria
according to DFID or similar standards;
e) adhere to the principles of corporate social responsibility and
adoption of international corporate governance standards; and
f) contribute tangibly to local entrepreneurial development and
capacity building. 


Possible intervention by DFID  In the context of 'unlocking the
potential', Booker Tate would like to suggest that DFID considers
support along the following lines:

· the provision of loan guarantees or the underwriting of debt for
specific projects;
· the commitment of equity or grant funds into an agribusiness
investment fund thereby lowering the cost of investment capital,
underwriting some of the risk and encouraging private sector investment
in a project; 
· the contribution of grant or low cost funds towards the provision of
social infrastructure for specific agricultural projects.

Jonathan Inneseon to providing opportunities for eco
Senior Economist
Booker Tate Ltd


Jonathan Innes

Booker Tate Ltd
Masters Court, Church Road
Thame, Oxon, OX9 3FA
United Kingdom

Direct Line:    +44 (0)1844 251051
Switchboard: +44 (0)1844 251000
Fax:              +44 (0)1844 251020



________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
=============================================================
To send a reply to this message that goes to all list members,
make sure that you send your reply to <address removed>

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to "<address removed>", with the 
message body:

unsubscribe growth-and-poverty <your-email-address>


Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.