New Directions for Agriculture in Reducing Poverty

Public Policy and Expenditure Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index]

The balance between DFID expenditure on budget support, project, programme funding etc



Dear All,

Can I add a question to those set out by Stephen in his introduction to the 
theme? This relates to the balance between funding for budgetary support,  
projects, etc.  One of the main criticisms of projects arises from experience 
with agricultural projects in the 70s and 80s when they were large, complex and 
appeared to have failed because of (a) management and implementation failures  
and (b) failure to address more fundamental macro-economic and sectoral 
constraints. However we have learnt a fair amount since then (both from those 
failures and from experience with the alternatives) and projects were also 
sometimes very successful. However projects now run against the emphasis on low 
cost disbursement.  

 Is this an issue that this forum needs to address? Is budgetary support 
appropriate to agriculture? In what way and under what conditions? Does DFID 
need to put more emphasis on projects? How could this be done in a way that 
addresses the issues raised above?

 Best wishes

 Andrew


Andrew Dorward 
Reader in Agricultural Development Economics 
Director, Centre for Development and Poverty Reduction 
Department of Agricultural Sciences 
Imperial College London 
Wye Campus 
Wye 
ASHFORD 
Kent TN25 5AH 
UK 

Tel: +44 (0)207 594 2679 
Fax: +44 (0)207 594 2838 

Visit our website at www.wye.ic.ac.uk/AgEcon/ADU for more information about 
research and teaching and for a range of downloadable working papers



 



Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.