![]() |
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
PUBLIC POLICY AND EXPENDITURE Response from Jock Campbell, IMM Ltd To place this response in context, IMM is a private sector research and development group based at Exeter University Campus. If we are to address the issue of how the role of public policy and expenditure on agriculture can be made more effective in achieving poverty reduction then we should address several key issues: a.. The importance of viewing agricultural policy in a holistic and integrated context b.. The need to improve policy research that targets the poor c.. The gap between the poor and the policy process d.. Improving both service delivery mechanisms and the ability of the poor to take-up those services and thus make policy implementation more effective Holistic policy Whereas much of the debate in this electronic forum has so far focused on agriculture in the narrow sense, we need to broaden it to address areas such as fisheries, forestry, and livestock. The reason being that these are all intrinsically linked. For example the rapid turn-over of fisheries products (because of the daily harvesting and perishability) provides much needed investment in goods and services in agriculture when seasonal cash-flow shortages would otherwise exist; fuelwood collection and fishing provides seasonal work to many agricultural labourers; livestock is a capital reserve for many in agricultural communities. The SLA encourages us to link these sectors together and to address many other cross-sectoral issues as well. Recent work we have been doing in fisheries in Ghana and in Cambodia clearly shows that many of the poor's priorities are for health and education with economic activities coming along behind. This does not mean that agriculture (in the broadest sense) should not be a priority but that it needs to be closely linked in to these other areas. We also need to share experiences between agriculture, forestry and fisheries and learnt from each others successes. Targeted policy research There is a growing realization that research that informs policy in many countries is irrelevant to the poor and misses them completely. The mechanisms to allow effective participation by the poor in all stages of the policy process, whilst well known, are rarely used effectively. Even when research is relevant to the needs of the poor it rarely gets to the diversity of stakeholders that influence the development and implementation of policy in forms that changes their behaviour. There is a need to engage the poor in the policy research process much more effectively at all stages of the research process. There is also a need for much more systematic approaches to the way policy research outputs are disseminated and used. Poverty-Policy Gap For many poor people the policy process is remote and largely irrelevant. They are rarely consulted in the formulation of policy and policy implementation often passes them by. Even in areas where development appears to be working well the poor tend to become "interstitial poor" falling into the gaps between peaks of development activity. There is a need for much greater involvement of the poor in all stages of the policy process and for mechanisms to allow this to take place. This in turn requires considerable capacity building in government, private sector and civil society to work with the poor and capacity building with the poor to contribute to the policy process. Service delivery and uptake Pro-poor policy in agriculture is of little value unless policy implementation also addresses the needs of the poor in ways that they can understand and respond to. So often market liberalization is seen as the panacea to poverty reduction whereas the poor are rarely able to respond to market change with the speed and innovation that the better off can. Improved service delivery of all forms needs to be closely linked to support to the poor to take up and use those new opportunities quickly. Without this poverty is likely to become interstitial in nature and remain unseen within a wider development process. Without an emphasis on greater and more effective inclusion of the poor in the policy process through these mechanisms then the debate on the effectiveness of public expenditure in poverty reduction is likely to be largely lacking in relevance to the poor. This requires a greater focus on vertical and horizontal integration processes and mechanisms and on the capacity and institutional structures to put them into practice. Jock Campbell IMM Ltd Website: http://www.ex.ac.uk/imm/ The Innovation Centre, Rennes Drive, University of Exeter Campus, Exeter, EX4 4RN, UK Tel: +44 1392 434143 UK Mobile: 07770 940 122 Email: <address removed>
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.