![]() |
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
You set out the "big picture" relating to vulnerability and the capacity of the poor to engage in markets in a useful and thought-provoking way. I am particularly interested in your reference to "non-risk" factors contributing to vulnerability: gender; age; ethnic and religious minorities, etc. In the Southern African context, with which I am most familiar, there is increasing recognition of the significant impact of these factors on entitlements, and the need therefore for policy to take account of them. But how do we go about this? There seem to be various areas for action: to address "risk coping" objectives more effectively within the policy framework surely depends on the development of more detailed vulnerability assessment indicators for household and community level, extending the rather blunt food economy approach, so that the array of available interventions can be targeted more effectively. I find it harder to see how "risk mitigation" and "risk reduction" objectives can be met for non-risk factors other than by broader policies designed to address social exclusion, but what do others think? We have explored some of these issues in the Forum for Food Security in Southern Africa (www.odi.org.uk/food-security-forum); I would be very interested to hear the thoughts and experiences of others from other regions. Elizabeth Cromwell Rural Policy and Environment Group Overseas Development Institute 111 Westminster Bridge Rd London SE1 7JD ============================================================= To send a reply to this message that goes to all list members, make sure that you send your reply to <address removed> To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to "<address removed>", with the message body: unsubscribe risk-and-vulnerability <your-email-address>
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.