![]() |
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
Many thanks to Elizabeth Cromwell for leading us off with this pertinent point. Following this email, and the discussion under the other themes in the DFID e-forum on agriculture, it is clear that this is a timely point for the issues of risk and vulnerability to spring more clearly out of the discussion. So for all of you out there who have been biting your tongues and waiting with anticipation for the ripe moment to launch your thoughts on this topic, let me encourage proceed without caution. In his opening paper on this theme John Farrington poses the questions: 1.. How can risk reduction be mainstreamed in to policy making in the agricultural sector? 2.. How can the private sector assist agricultural growth in poor and remote areas? 3.. How can real protection against risk actually be implemented? But what are the questions should we be asking? Or what are the questions that you yourself want to answer...? a.. What do kind of risks should we be looking at? Do we need to go beyond the traditional list of weather, price fluctuations, changes in demand and the occurrence of new pests and diseases? b.. What are the factors and outcomes associated with being risk aversive? c.. How can the poor manage uncertainties associated with the market and its dynamic nature? d.. What role do subsidies and trade barriers play in increasing or decreasing vulnerability? e.. Is diversification really the answer? f.. How can the private sector be attracted to play a role in the promotion of risk reduction in agricultural growth? What regulatory reforms are needed? g.. Is it possible to actively promote informal institutions which act to reduce vulnerability? So with your answers, further questions and thoughts please help us to understand, amongst other things, how the 'trampoline effect' can be put into practice to ensure that the poor are able to 'bounce back' higher and more quickly from shocks..
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.