![]() |
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
In my comments through the other theme I have emphasized the importance of the private sector as the most cost effective provider of sustainable support services to the smallholders. There are really 2 components to the private sector the corporative sector such as the Unilvers, Cargills, etc. and the local village enterprises. I think most people when reflecting on the private sector think of the corporate component. However, I emphasis the village enterprise. These tend to be primarily family enterprises and rarely get bigger than that. The most visible example of this would be the Talid Thai wholesale market just north to Bangkok and directly across the highway from the Asian Institute of Technology. It is a massive facilitate, but on closer look it is all subdivided into individual family operations each with a permanently rented floor space that has been customized to the family, etc. For those interested if I observed it correctly and in traditional Asian fashion the wives are running it and husbands are more formans then managers. The point here is that this provides a highly fragmented marketing structure with each enterprise having only a limited market volume in which to make their living. The fragmentation means their is competition which assures the farmers and consumer the best value. However, it also means a reasonable high mark-up, as the minimum mark-up the traders can accept is that which will provide their families a reasonable livelihood. The other aspects is why are they restricted to family enterprises, and not expanding. My guess is the lack of trust in trusting administrative task to other people. This also one reason why the cooperative have such problems as they are highly dependent of trust. Any thoughts. Dick Tinsley
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.