![]() |
|||||||||
| |
|||||||||
I find myself in agreement with Colin's line of thinking on extension although like him I am not an extension specialist. Face to face contact is the best means of conveying information to and from farmers. Provided that the service is properly equipped, there is a great deal that a public extension can do to promote productivity, disease control, diversification and better all round practice. Particularly when. as Colin says, its is well directed towards specific objectives. There are two points I would add from my experience. Firstly, instead of information technology seeking to replace extension workers, which it can't, IT can be used as a resource for extension workers to allow them to access information, keep up with latest developments and send specific enquiries to a central processing point. In India there is at present a great deal of enthusiasm about using IT and they now have call centres as well as private buying agents who also provide some advisory services. The second point is that where effective, there is no reason why extension cannot be contracted to the private sector be it in the form of graduates from agricultural universities who have set up agri-clinics or companies willing to develop the provision of private extension. What is important is that public provision of extension in developing countries should be a right and the state should pay. Best wishes, Vinay Chand, 230, Finchley Road, London NW3 6DJ, UK Tel: 44-20-7794 5977 Fax: 44-20-7431 5715 <address removed><mailto:<address removed>>
Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.