New Directions for Agriculture in Reducing Poverty

Science and Technology Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index]

Re: Food security, growth, gender and the object of DFID's aid



I have been following these discussions for a couple of weeks, and share
with Clive Robinson surprise and concern that there has been little
mention of gender issues so far. I would like to add to his excellent
comments on the role of women in food production and family well-being.  I
am copying this message to the science and technology list as well, for
the reason that although I may have missed something, I have seen no
references to gender issues in discussions in this very important area. 

The Gender Working Group of the UN Commission on Science and Technology
for Development recognised in 1995 that despite the implementation of S&T
for development over the previous 30 years, women were still finding it
difficult to meet their own basic needs and the basic needs of their
households. The Group found, in fact, that women have become
disproportionately poor in relation to men in their communities during
that period.  The reasons for this are many, but in general, can be traced
to the situation the gender-specific nature of development benefits, roles
and opportunities are not adequately recognised and addressed. 

Despite these problems, technology has tremendous potential for enhancing
women?s contributions to agricultural production. Low-cost, reliable
sources of energy for processing, cooking, and lighting can make for less
burdensome work, improved health, and more time. Selling or renting
technology or using it for better market access contributes to
income-generation.

In response to the discussion on cooperatives, I'd like to emphasis that
cooperatives and self-help organisations are important means for women to
promote their concerns and perspectives and can even provide venues for
marketing and production which might not otherwise be available to them. 
In groups,women are better able to develop their own arrangements in
managing and sustaining new technologies. They can build their capacity
for bargaining as individuals and find ways to retain the ownership and
control of new technologies.

Cases of technology development and application which take into
consideration gender and social concerns are on the increase, for example,
the development of fuel-efficient stoves which are designed in
consultation with women and local artisans and which reduce women?s labor,
conserve fuel, and decrease pollutants.  Nevertheless, more needs to be
done.

(In addition it should be remembered that "gender" includes men, but
involves a recognition of the varying roles, status in society and
perceptions of women and men at different socio-economic levels.)

The International Food Policy Research Institute provides an outline of
areas to focus on in supporting more gender-equitable access to and use of
technologies for greater food production and income generation, which
produce specific benefits for women (to redress past inequities) and poor
men, such as:

1. Food processing
- Increased land productivity
- Increased access to land rights
- Independent income 
- Reduced drudgery, for example of hand pounding
- Time savings and flexibility in time use
- Additional income

2. Cookstoves
- Improved stoves which use available biomass and do not cause respiratory
problems
- Reduce dependency on carbon sources and focus on small, flexible energy
sources which also offer entrepreneurship potential

3. Pest Management
- Integrated pest management strategies which increase savings on
pesticides and reduce or eliminates harmful effects on human health and
food in the natural habitat

 4. Livestock: 
-Upgrading of poultry breeds
 - Use of local crop byproducts as ingredient for swine ration
- Increased profitability of backyard swine production

As CGIAR notes, most technologies are bound up in hardware and their
products are goods to be sold or used. Questions of access and control are
central in determining actual benefits to women. Twenty years of research
on appropriate technologies for women and agriculture provide well-tested
guidance on how to develop technologies to assure their acceptability to,
likelihood of success for, and ability to empower women users. Such
efforts require commitment and attention. They have the following elements:

 - Discarding assumptions about women's use of technology 
- Delineating target groups carefully. Women are not a homogenous group
and often have different interests. 
- Forming multidisciplinary teams.
- Using a gender-sensitive participatory approach


Sophia Huyer, PhD
Executive Director
Gender Advisory Board, UNCSTD
<address removed>
http://GAB.wigsat.org


<address removed> writes:
>
>3        In January I shared with DFID a prophetic concern that, one
>small reference apart, there was no mention of gender in Unlocking the
>potential. With the admirable exception of Per Eklund's contribution on
>nutrition, there have been a couple of very passing references to women
>in the two e-conference groups but I have read no gender analysis of the
>role of women in agriculture. Agriculture places a huge labour demand on
>women who are also responsible for most aspects of food utilisation.
>Their productive and reproductive roles combine to make them, "farmer,
>fetcher of water and woodfuel, caregiver to children, the aged and the
>ill, preparer of meals and income-earner from off-farm employment"
>(Government of Ethiopia Food Security Strategy, 1996). An Africa-wide FAO
>survey reports that women contribute much more than half the labour to
>food production, hoeing and weeding, harvesting and marketing, food
>processing, storage and transport from farm to village, water and
>woodfuel fetching. A recent survey in Eritrea has echoed findings
>elsewhere that, though female-headed households dispose of fewer assets
>than male-headed households, they consume slightly more food and achieve
>better nutrition for their families (CARE, ERREC and WFP: Rural
>livelihood security assessment, 2003). Enhancing women's access to and
>control over resources, assets and decision-making is crucial to
>improving the outcomes of agriculture.


--
Sophia Huyer
Women in Global Science and Technology
204 Ventress Road
Brighton, Ontario, Canada
K0K 1H0
Tel (1-905) 355-5124
Fax (1-905) 355-3229
<address removed>
www.wigsat.org
http://GSTGateway.wigsat.org

=============================================================
To send a reply to this message that goes to all list members,
make sure that you send your reply to <address removed>

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to "<address removed>", with the 
message body:

unsubscribe science-and-technology <your-email-address>


Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.