New Directions for Agriculture in Reducing Poverty

Science and Technology Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index]

RE: Ensuring that clients benefit from agricultural research



I am writing in response to Paul Mundy's earlier comments about ensuring
that clients receive the benefit of research findings. Whilst this
original comment was chiefly concerned with agriculture, obviously this
subject concerns many other disciplines. 

 

I work at the Institute of Development Studies in Sussex. We have a
large number of teams at this institute working to ensure that the key
findings of academic research reaches policy makers, politicians and
NGO's in LDCs. These departments are id21, BRIDGE, Eldis, Livelihoods
Connect, BLDS, and GDNet.

 

I work for id21, a free development research reporting service funded by
DFID. Our mission is to communicate development research findings to
policy-makers and practitioners in a jargon-free and concise format
through our online database of research highlights, email newsletters
and printed journals. We produce research highlights and articles on
subjects including food security, forced migration, conflict resolution,
refugee education and many categories of health research. 

 

Whilst not all research will be featured in our output, the response we
have received from people in developing countries is very encouraging.
Over 20,000 subscribers receive id21's email bulletins, and the same
number receive our 'Insights' publications. We also place a great
emphasis in writing our summaries and articles in a jargon-free, easy to
understand style. 

 

For more information on any of these services, please visit our
websites:

 

www.id21.org <http://www.id21.org/> 

http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/info/index.html

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Mundy [mailto:<address removed> 
Sent: 26 May 2004 12:51
To: <address removed>
Cc: <address removed>
Subject: Ensuring that clients benefit from agricultural research

 

Colleagues:

 

I'd like to return to the issue of ensuring that research findings reach
the 

people who need them.

 

Research institutes in the developing world put a lot of emphasis on 

publishing articles in scientific journals, and holding conferences and 

seminars. But the only people who can read the journals, or attend the 

conferences, are other scientists. Journals are mostly published
in-house, 

so have very limited circulation, and are written in scientific jargon.

 

Despite all the effort that goes into these journals and conferences,
their 

direct contribution to development is close to zero.

 

Whose job is it to translate from the research language into extension 

materials, mass media, and training courses? Research institutes tend to


think this is the job of the extension agencies. But extension agencies 

simply do not have the capability to undertake this conversion process.
The 

result is that a lot of good research ends up unused, sitting in desk 

drawers and on library shelves.

 

Researchers, and research institutes, have little incentive to translate


their findings into a form that normal mortals can understand. In
Indonesia, 

for example, researchers are promoted according to a credit-points
system. 

An article in a journal fetches 25 credits. An extension article yields
a 

single credit. No wonder that researchers spend their time trying to
split 

the findings of their latest series of experiments into as many separate


journal articles as possible - instead of writing an overall piece 

summarizing the work in a form that extensionists and farmers might be
able 

to use.

 

Some research institutes train staff how to write for a popular
audience. 

But they do little to help them find outlets for their work. Public 

awareness units of research institutions are rare, weak, and generally 

staffed by agricultural scientists rather than journalists or media 

professionals. Research institutions produce few publications aimed at 

extensionists, farmers or the public. They work very little with the
mass 

media.

 

Some suggestions for DFID:

- Encourage national research institutions to reward researchers for 

translating research into everyday language.

- Find ways to reward researchers for disseminating innovations, not
just 

for developing them.

- Put more emphasis on ensuring that research focuses on critical
problems, 

and on ensuring that the solutions are implementable (and are
implemented) 

by the people who need them.

- Strengthen the units responsible for public awareness and extension 

liaison in research institutions.

- Expand the target clientele for agricultural research to include NGOs
and 

the private sector, not just extensionists and farmers.

 

 

Paul Mundy

development communication

<address removed>

www.mamud.com

 

_________________________________________________________________

Express yourself with the new version of MSN Messenger! Download today -


it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

 

=============================================================

To send a reply to this message that goes to all list members,

make sure that you send your reply to
<address removed>

 

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to
"<address removed>", with the message body:

 

unsubscribe science-and-technology <your-email-address>


This message is for the addressee only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information.  If you have received it in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete the original. Any views or opinions expressed are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of IDS.

Institute of Development Studies
at the University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RE
Tel: +44 (0)1273 606261; Fax: +44 (0)1273 621202
IDS, a charitable company limited by guarantee:
Registered Charity No. 306371; Registered in England 877338;  VAT No. GB 350 
899914




Please visit dfid-agriculture-consultation.nri.org.